"Anarchism
and the 'unreal self': Laura (Riding) Jackson and Kathy Acker"
an excerpt,
by Jeanne
Heuving
From
The Violence of Negation or 'Love's Infolding'
Laura (Riding)
Jackson's most stunning work of pastiche is Anarchism Is Not Enough
(1928), made up of mock poetic manifestoes, critical and theoretical exegesis,
and fictional extravaganzas. Central to this volume and to understanding
(Riding) Jackson's entire career is her concept of the "individual-unreal"
or "unreal self," developed in her essay "Jocasta," named for the erased
and contaminated mother of the Oedipus myth. (Riding) Jackson, who felt
that existing social orders belied the self, postulated through her concept
of an "unreal self," an entity apart from these orders. Indeed, the "individual-unreal"
or the "unreal self" might be seen as the rejecting substratum of the
self that would change the terms of its existence. (Riding) Jackson writes,
"In every person there is the possibility of a small, pure, new, unreal
portion which is, without reference to personality in the popular, social
sense, self. I use 'self' in no romantic connotation, but only because
it is the most vivid word I can find for this particular purefaction."
As (Riding) Jackson put it, the "unreal is to me poetry." (Jackson, Anarchism,
96, 99)
From (Riding)
Jackson's perspective, most twentieth-century writing was an art of the
"individual-real" and was compelled by "the nostalgic desire to reconstitute
an illusory whole that has no integrity but the integrity of accident"
(Anarchism, 104). Such an art was hopelessly "synthetic": "imitative,
communicative, provocative of association." In contrast a poetry of the
"individual-unreal" was "analytic" "original, dissociative and provocative
of dissociation" (Anarchism, 115). (Riding) Jackson comments:
The end of poetry
is to leave everything as pure and bare as possible after its operation.
It is therefore important that its tools of destruction should be
as frugal, economical as possible. When the destruction or analysis
is accomplished they shall have to account for their necessity; they
are the survivors, the result as well as the means of elimination...The
greater the clutter attacked and the smaller, the purer, the residue
to which it is reduced (the more destructive the tools), the better
the poem. (Anarchism, 117)
Perhaps more than
any other poet of the twentieth century (Riding) Jackson works to negate
the narcissistic and idealizing psychic economies and the signifying practices
that underwrite them, so critical for most literature, especially poetry.
The last two pieces in Anarchism Is Not Enough, "The Damned Thing"
and "Letter of Abdication," show both the range of (Riding) Jackson's
pastiche and the force of her social critique. In "The Damned Thing,"
(Riding) Jackson analyzes the production of sexuality within civilization,
dismissing literary sensibilities as deeply implicated in such a production.
As she saw it, man's "phallus proud-works-of art" amount to little more
than man's "private play with [woman] in public" (Anarchism, 208,
205). Indeed, sexuality has been overwritten by a civilization uncomfortable
with it. The king pin of this system is women's "sexual impersonality"
that "if not philosophized, would wreck the solemn masculine machine"
(Anarchism, 196). Importantly her target for attack is neither
men nor sexuality, but the ways sexual desire has been produced through
an "insidious, civilized traffic." In its civilized version, sexuality
is produced as a kind of rare brew of bodily impulses, scientific phrases,
and literary sentiments, which all conspire to keep women in a passive
state. (Riding) Jackson parodies "the diffusion which modern society calls
love," revealing how a man's "I love you" speech is constituted:
My sexual glands
by the ingrowing enlargement of my sex instinct since childhood and
its insidious, civilized traffic with every part of my mental and
physical being, are unfortunately in a state of continual excitement.
I have very good control of myself, but my awareness of your sexual
physique and its radiations was so acute that I could not resist the
temptation to desire to lie with you. Please do not think this ignoble
of me, for I shall perform this act, if you permit it, with the greatest
respect and tenderness and attempt to make up for the indignity it
of course fundamentally will be to you (however pleasurable) by serving
you in every possible way and by sexually flattering manifestations
of your personality which are not strictly sexual.
(Anarchism,
189)
In the concluding
piece of Anarchism Is Not Enough, "Letter of Abdication," an autocratic
"I" or "Queen" abdicates her authority, impugning a "you," her audience.
The fictional extravaganza is a virtual extinguishing of narcissistic
and idealizing psychological relations that might animate relations between
such a Queen and her entourage. She upbraids her audience, "You are sticky
instead of rubbery. You represent yourself with priggish sincerity instead
of mimicking yourself with grotesque accuracy" (Anarchism, 209).
She further condemns, "You know only how to be either heroes or cowards.
But you do not know how to outwit yourselves by being neither, though
seeming to be both. 'What,' you say indignantly, 'would you have us be
nothing?' Ah, my dear people, if you could you would all shortly become
Queens" (Anarchism, 224). In the conclusion of the piece, the autocratic
"I" flounces out, "Good-bye. I am going back to my mirror, where I came
from" (Anarchism, 224). In this perverse writing, it is fitting
that the Queen should exit with such finality into a mirror, as she has
so thoroughly denounced all mirroring relations.
While (Riding)
Jackson's early writing is importantly excessive in its modes of over-
statement, her poetry is decidedly spare and economical. Valuing at this
time her poetry more highly than any of her other writing, (Riding) Jackson
equates its intellectual shaping with the very existence of a "real":
There is a sense
of life so real that it becomes the sense of something more real than
life...It introduces a principle of selection into the undifferentiating
quantitative appetite and thus changes accidental emotional forms
into deliberate intellectual forms...It is the meaning at work in
what has no meaning; it is, at its clearest, poetry. (Jackson, Contemporaries,
9)
In the poem "Be
Grave, Woman," the speaker in search of a new "real" negates existing
love scenarios. Invoking a doubly directed pun of a "grave" demeanor and
a "grave" as a place of death, the speaker ends any errant yearnings for
love in the "grave" woman herself:
Be grave, woman
for love
Still hungering
as gardens
For rain
though flowerless
What perfume
now to rise
From weary
expectation.
Be not wild to
love,
Poor witch
of mysteries
Whose golden
age they bodys
Alchemy
aburn was
Unto haggard
ember.
Beautys
flesh to phantom
Wears unprosperous
And come
but devils of
Chill omen
to adore
The perforce
chaste idolon.
Be grave, woman,
to greet
The kiss,
the clasp, the shudder which
Rage of
thee from crafty
Lust unrolls--and
think
These are
thy dead to grieve on
And thyself the
death in whom
Love must
disaster and
Be long
ago in ruin-sweet
Story,
on the sense to ponder
Thou alone,
stark mind.
(Poems,
264)
The poem would
end loves impoverished bewitching and "unprosperous" idolizing
of beauty. Negating love's corrupt craftiness, born of what (Riding) Jackson
calls in another poem "the patriarchal leer," the speaker imagines a different
love (Poems, 267). Only by passing through a "grave" woman and
her "stark mind" will this changed love be possible. While some critics
have mistakenly seen (Riding) Jackson's emphasis on the mind throughout
her work as making her a "philosophical poet," an epithet that (Riding)
Jackson herself abjured, importantly her emphasis on the mind is rather
on what the mind enacts, its intellectual judgments, and negations.
Few, if any writers,
can equal the extreme ferocity and spare bleakness of (Riding) Jackson's
early writings. However, Kathy Acker comes to mind, albeit differently.
If (Riding) Jackson aims to negate existing love economies of idealism
and narcissism, Acker explores these ad nauseam. At once evoking
and deflating these economies through disclosure of their sado-masochistic
dimensions, Acker combines mytho-poetic modes with flattened non-sequiturs.
Lyrical effusions amplify the rationalized languages of an industrialized
society and the sound bite logics of newspeak. Acker begins Don Quixote
with an overview of its heroic quest:
When she was
finally crazy because she was about to have an abortion, she conceived
of the most insane idea that any woman can think of. Which is to love.
How can a woman love? By loving someone other than herself. She would
love another person. By loving another person, she would right every
manner of political, social, and individual wrong; she would put herself
in those situations so perilous the glory of her name would resound.
The abortion was about to take place. (Acker, 9)
Initially undertaking
a line of feminine reasoning, love will save the world and bring honor
to the woman, the narrational tone abruptly shifts as a kind of deus
ex machina comes down: "The abortion was about to take place."
Throughout the
opening pages of Don Quixote, an abortion, technically the demise
of love-making, functions as the mock heroic event by which this knight
can gain her "knighthood / nighthood." The term 'abortion,' a particularly
ugly denomination for a 'woman's right to choose,' introduces the possibility
of complex psychological and linguistic operations, such as castration
and negation, which are, in turn, negated through the flattened naming
of the event. Modern day hospital technologies shift into memories of
Don Quixote's sixteenth century misfortunes and other epochal landscapes
of despair:
They told her
they were going to take her from the operating chair to her own bed
in a wheeling chair. The wheeling chair would be her transportation.
She went out to look at it. It was dying. It had once been a hack,
the same as all the hacks on grub street; now, as all the hacks, was
a full-time drunk, mumbled all the time about sex but now no longer
not even never did it but didn't have the wherewithal or equipment
to do it, and hung around with the other bums. That is, women who're
having abortions. (Acker, 9)
Acker engages more
punning, turning the mythic abortion into multiple indignities and impossibilities:
As we've said,
her wheeling bed's name was 'Hack-kneed' or 'Hackneyed', meaning once
a hack' or always a hack' or 'a writer' or 'an attempt to have an
identity that always fails.' Just as 'Hackneyed' is the glorification
or change from non-existence into existence of Hack-kneed,' so, she
decided, 'catheter' is the glorification of 'Kathy.' By taking on
such a name which, being long, is male, she would be able to become
a female-male or a night-knight. (Acker, 10)
Unlike (Riding)
Jackson, who, at least in her poetry, would turn her negations into dignified
rearticulations, Acker hungers around the economies of love's "despite."
In the section titled, "Heterosexuality," Acker explores what for Don
Quixote is the most intense experience of passionate love, "rejection."
She calls attention to the mirroring economies of narcissistic and idealizing
love relations by staging two androgynous figures, De Franville and Villebranche,
whose multiplied negated sexual identities work to make them the most
alluring sexual objects around:
Both men and
women adored this creature who, by his/her sexual void, like a magnet,
attracted most those whose sexual desires were the fiercest. He/She
seemed to be magnificently sexual. (Acker, 129)
While here the representation
of sexuality spins out into mirrors of non-identity, at other times in
the text, brutally physical sado-masochistic relations prevail. In one
incident, a student returns to a teacher whose love for the student is
most evident in his brutal whipping of him.
In the conclusion
of Don Quixote, several affirmative statements emerge born of the
terrible negations of this text. In one, Don Quixote rejoices in a desire
"restored," through complete "neediness" and "desparation," which is equated
with "the desperation of a baby who must suck [her mother's] nipple" (Acker,
192). In another, a "female pirate" travels over "crumbling European waters"
in a new "mo[u]rning," "totally strong in [her] helplessness," listening
to the "violent sex between sun and water" (Acker, 200).
Works Cited
Acker, Kathy. Don
Quixote. (New York: Grove Press, 1986).
DuPlessis, Rachel
Blau. The Pink Guitar. (New York: Routledge, 1990).
Heuving, Jeanne.
"Laura (Riding) Jackson's 'Really New' Poem, in Gendered Modernisms:
American Women Poets and their Readers, ed. Margaret Dickie and Thomas
Travisano. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996).
(Riding) Jackson,
Laura. Anarchism Is Not Enough (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, Doran
and Company, 1928).
(Riding) Jackson,
Laura. Contemporaries and Snobs (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday,
Doran ad Co, 1928).
(Riding) Jackson,
Laura. The Poems of Laura Riding (New York: Persea Books, 1938,
1980).
Author's Note:
The excerpt is taken from my article, "The Violence of Negation or
'Love's Infolding'" written for The World in Time and Space: Towards
a History of Innovative American Poetry 1970-2000, edited by Joseph
Donahue and Ed Foster, forthcoming later this year; and it appears in
HOW2 with the permission of Talisman House, Publishers.
In conformity with
the late author's wish, her Board of Literary Management asks us to record
that, in 1941, Laura (Riding) Jackson renounced, on grounds of linguistic
principle, the writing of poetry: she had come to hold that "poetry obstructs
general attainment to something better in our linguistic way-of-life than
we have".
BIO:
Jeanne Heuving has written multiple critical articles on avant garde women
poets and poetics and the book, Omissions Are Not Accidents: Gender
in the Art of Marianne Moore. She is currently at work on a book project,
"Devastating Poetry," which explores the writing of love and sexuality
in modernist and contemporary women poets, for which she has received
grants from the NEH and Walter J. Simpson Humanities Center at the University
of Washington. She is on the faculty of the University of Washington,
Bothell and the Graduate School of the University of Washington. She is
a member of the Subtext Collective, a community writers group which puts
on a reading series of innovative writers in Seattle.