NOTES ON READING LORINE NIEDECKER
What's here?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() : economies undertaken for the joy of seeing how much a few words will bear. Here evolution, housed in a museum, is an idea we walk through, meeting (as we might meet in a Marianne Moore poem) the simple creature with its gaudy latinate name. But Niedecker doesn't choose to go on for five pages topping herself with witty ironies as Moore might do. She draws the poem taut, matching ends and ends, putting "you" in the center, as it happens, of that renewable forest commonly called "man":
: a kind of "flowering of the rod" unlike H.D.'s, but as visionary in its way, drawing on the scientific myth of evolution to evoke the sense of continuity of mind and form. She says: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]()
and later in the same poem ("Wintergreen Ridge"):
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]()
She wrote to Cid Corman in 1965 ". . . that meaning has something to do with song -- one hesitates a bit longer with some words in some lines for the thought or the vision -- but I'd say mostly, of course, cadence, measure make song. And a kind of shine (or sombre tone) that is of the same intensity throughout the poem. And the thing moves. But as in all poems, everywhere, depth of emotion condensed. . . "
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
That light, that "shine" became by some synesthetic process the "tone," that light perceived as sound. Yet tone is more than sound, always difficult to hear or name. It's what is there inside the sound, the song or given measure; it has to do with the substance of the poem, its concrete particular thingness. But not static. The "intensity" she says, that pressure under which the (thing? poem?) turns, is transformed.
(These were, according to Cid Corman, Niedecker's last recorded words, November 15, 1970, in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin.) : a clear spare native American idiom: to see in that
turn of speech:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
--Beverly Dahlen
More thoughts: The difficulty of beginning to talk of Niedecker's work is the number of other readings that are left out -- there are the poems having to do with her relationship to the culture of women: the small town women whom she both admired and felt isolated from ("In the great snowball before the bomb," T & G); literary women ("Who was Mary Shelley," T & G); her view of marriage ("I rose from marsh mud," T & G). It is ironic that Niedecker's work, as H.D.'s, has often been reduced to a simplistic version of small perfections, whereas the work proves to be tenacious, sinewy, not merely gem-like -- a persistence of mind which finds its constant focus in the natural and domestic world. It is also a curious phenomenon to discover, in various footnotes and memories, that there exists the mistaken notion that Niedecker's work appeared in An "Objectivist" Anthology (1932) and/or in the "Objectivist" issue of Poetry (Feb., 1931), edited by Louis Zukofsky. It, in fact, did not appear. As Carl Rakosi remembers it, Zukofsky -- who both admired and severely critiqued Niedecker's work, via their long literary correspondence -- had invited Niedecker to submit poems for the issue of Poetry he was editing, but her manuscript didn't arrive in time. Largely due to the efforts of Cid Corman, poet and editor of Origin, her work found an audience. Letters and poems appeared in Origin, 3rd series, No. 2, July, 1966, and in its 4th series, No. 16, July, 1981. Truck, No. 16, 1975, devoted a complete issue to Niedecker's works (see the article "A Woman Poet, Specifically," by Jane Augustine, for a thoughtful discussion of poems cited above). Two recent close readings of Niedecker poems appear in Sagetrieb, Vol. 1, No. 2, Fall, 1982. -- K.F., F.J., B. D. go to this issue's table of contents
|