[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Electronic Submission, Delivery and Storage of ETDs at UMI

ECURE 2001
Preservation and Access for Electronic College and University Records

October 13, 2001
Hilton Phoenix East/Mesa
Mesa, AZ 85210

Bill Savage
UMI Dissertations Publishing
University of Michigan
bill.savage@il.proquest.com

1

Background

2

Background

3

Background

4

Nature of the Dissertation

5

Nature of the Dissertation

6

Nature of the Dissertation

7

The Changing Environment

8

The Changing Environment

9

The Changing Environment

10

Managing Access

DAI Citation

Title: Mapping artifacts on the frontier of ancient China: An approach to study of the Yan mountainous area in the eastern Zhou period (8th--3rd centuries BC)
Order No: 9985056
Author: Li, Jian-jing
Degree: PhD
Corporate Source/Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Date: 2000
Pages: 143
Advisor: Linduff, Katheryn M.
ISBN: 0-599-92061-0
Source: DAI-A 61/08, p. 2959, Feb 2001
Descriptors: ART HISTORY; HISTORY, ASIA, AUSTRALIA AND OCEANIA
Descriptor Codes: 0377; 0332

11

Managing Access

Abstract:

Study of the late Zhou period in China has concentrated on analysis of the agrarian-based states. Interaction between those who constituted the Chinese dynastic states and pastoral peoples on the periphery of them were often described in hostile or colonial terms. With only the official histories as guides, an explanation that drew strict boundaries between them prevailed until the late 20th century. With increased archaeological information documenting activity outside of dynastic centers, the former interpretation can be tested. An alternative scenario at the frontier is proposed here.

Study of artifacts, their disposition and cultural use have provided the basic tool for identifying distinctive life ways and affiliations. Both Chinese and frontier burial materials and practices have been researched and interpreted with knowledge of and comparison to other border societies and theory about frontiers and their function in relation to a central political unit. Focus is on the Yan Mountain region and its relation to the Zhou vassal state of Yan in northeast China.

12

Managing Access

This study shows that both the Shanrong group of the Yan Mountain region and the Yan State had their own distinctive social order, cultural traditions and economic bases. Those are marked in the burial assemblages, tomb structures and architectural remains, suggesting that Shanrong was a pastoral and warrior society and was clearly different from the agrarian society of the Yan State. On the one hand, these differences contributed to the formation of an ethnic and cultural boundary; but on the other hand, these different modes of subsistence encouraged them to complement each other functionally, thus making the Shanrong part of a larger social complex.

This case study demonstrates that the boundary between the Shanrong and the Yan State was fluid and was based on need. Interactions in trade, war and colonization occurring in the frontier zone exhibit evidence of the change through time. Technical and ecological factors stimulated a transformation of the structure of interchange on the pastoral/agricultural frontier. In addition, the elite groups from the Yan State and the Shanrong both played significant roles during the process, indicating that political authority still deeply influenced their interactions. Finally, inter-group contacts infused energy into the area and led these two groups to incorporate into a unified, multicultural Chinese kingdom.

13

Managing Access

DAI Citation

Data Element Chart

Tag
001
005
008
020
035
040
100
242
245
300

Description
Publication number/order number
Date and time of latest transaction
Fixed length data elements
ISBN
System control number
Cataloging source
Main author
English translation of foreign title
Title statement
Number of pages

Start Date *



January, 1998 for DAI



DAI-C Spring 1988

14

Managing Access

DAI Citation

Data Element Chart

Tag
500
500
500
502
506
520

535

Description
General note (Source)
General note (Publisher)
General note (Advisor)
Dissertation note
Restrictions on access note
Abstract of dissertation

Location of copy

Start Date *

DAI-C only
January 1988 for DAI


July 1980, for DAI
July 1988 for MAI
DAI-C Spring 1988

15

Managing Access

DAI Citation

Tag
590
650
690
700
710
740
773
790
790
791
792
793

Description
Local note (School code)
Subject term
Subject code
Added entry - Multiple Author
Added entry - Corporate name
Added entry - Variant title
Host item entry
Added entry -
School Code
Degree name
Degree date
Language of dissertation

Start Date *







Advisor name Jan 1989


July 1992 for DAI

* All fields listed are valid for all records in the database, covering all dates from 1861 forward with the exception of those so described in the start date column.

16

Dublin Core Elements

DAI Citation

Title
Creator
Subject
Description
Publisher
Contributor
Date
Type

Rights
Format
Identifier
Source
Language
Relation
Coverage

17

Delivery

Delivery

Delivery

YearSessionsSearchesDownloads
1999253,192838,37926,023
2000448,9331,551,10666,183
2001*409,3971,420,86893,961
*through august, 2001

Delivery

Delivery

YearSessionsSearchesDownloads
19991,9437,5071,813
20003,23512,9772,303
2001*2,2399,8533,902
*through August, 2001

Storage

Storage

Storage

Storage

Data Refreshing:

Storage

Migration:

Questions for the Very Near Future

Questions for the Very Near Future

Contact Info

Bill Savage
UMI Dissertations Publishing
bill.savage@il.proquest.com
bsavage@umi.com
1-800-521-0600 ext. 6726

30