[an error occurred while processing this directive]
ECURE 2001
Preservation and Access for Electronic College and University Records
October 13, 2001
Hilton Phoenix East/Mesa
Mesa, AZ 85210
Bill Savage
UMI Dissertations Publishing
University of Michigan
bill.savage@il.proquest.com
1
2
3
4
5
6
“ANY RECORD, WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, MAINTAINED BY AN INSTITUTION THAT IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO A STUDENT OR STUDENTS. THIS RECORD CAN CONTAIN A STUDENT'S NAME, OR STUDENTS’ NAMES OR INFORMATION FROM WHICH AN INDIVIDUAL STUDENT, OR STUDENTS, CAN BE PERSONALLY (INDIVIDUALLY) IDENTIFIED THESE RECORDS INCLUDE: FILES, DOCUMENTS, AND MATERIALS IN WHATEVER MEDIUM (HANDWRITING, PRINT, TAPES, DISKS, FILM, MICROFILM, MICROFICHE) WHICH CONTAIN INFORMATION DIRECTLY RELATED TO STUDENTS AND FROM WHICH STUDENTS CAN BE PERSONALLY (INDIVIDUALLY) IDENTIFIED.”
Richard Rainsberger, FERPA in the Digital Age: What You Need to Know, ECURE, 2000
7
8
9
10
DAI Citation
Title: Mapping artifacts on the frontier of ancient China: An approach to study of the Yan mountainous area in the eastern Zhou period (8th--3rd centuries BC)
Order No: 9985056
Author: Li, Jian-jing
Degree: PhD
Corporate Source/Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Date: 2000
Pages: 143
Advisor: Linduff, Katheryn M.
ISBN: 0-599-92061-0
Source: DAI-A 61/08, p. 2959, Feb 2001
Descriptors: ART HISTORY; HISTORY, ASIA, AUSTRALIA AND OCEANIA
Descriptor Codes: 0377; 0332
11
Abstract:
Study of the late Zhou period in China has concentrated on analysis of the agrarian-based states. Interaction between those who constituted the Chinese dynastic states and pastoral peoples on the periphery of them were often described in hostile or colonial terms. With only the official histories as guides, an explanation that drew strict boundaries between them prevailed until the late 20th century. With increased archaeological information documenting activity outside of dynastic centers, the former interpretation can be tested. An alternative scenario at the frontier is proposed here.
Study of artifacts, their disposition and cultural use have provided the basic tool for identifying distinctive life ways and affiliations. Both Chinese and frontier burial materials and practices have been researched and interpreted with knowledge of and comparison to other border societies and theory about frontiers and their function in relation to a central political unit. Focus is on the Yan Mountain region and its relation to the Zhou vassal state of Yan in northeast China.
12
This study shows that both the Shanrong group of the Yan Mountain region and the Yan State had their own distinctive social order, cultural traditions and economic bases. Those are marked in the burial assemblages, tomb structures and architectural remains, suggesting that Shanrong was a pastoral and warrior society and was clearly different from the agrarian society of the Yan State. On the one hand, these differences contributed to the formation of an ethnic and cultural boundary; but on the other hand, these different modes of subsistence encouraged them to complement each other functionally, thus making the Shanrong part of a larger social complex.
This case study demonstrates that the boundary between the Shanrong and the Yan State was fluid and was based on need. Interactions in trade, war and colonization occurring in the frontier zone exhibit evidence of the change through time. Technical and ecological factors stimulated a transformation of the structure of interchange on the pastoral/agricultural frontier. In addition, the elite groups from the Yan State and the Shanrong both played significant roles during the process, indicating that political authority still deeply influenced their interactions. Finally, inter-group contacts infused energy into the area and led these two groups to incorporate into a unified, multicultural Chinese kingdom.
13
DAI Citation
Data Element Chart
|
|
|
14
DAI Citation
Data Element Chart
|
|
|
15
DAI Citation
|
|
|
* All fields listed are valid for all records in the database, covering all dates from 1861 forward with the exception of those so described in the start date column.
16
DAI Citation
Title |
Rights |
17
Year | Sessions | Searches | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
1999 | 253,192 | 838,379 | 26,023 |
2000 | 448,933 | 1,551,106 | 66,183 |
2001* | 409,397 | 1,420,868 | 93,961 |
* | through august, 2001 |
Year | Sessions | Searches | Downloads |
---|---|---|---|
1999 | 1,943 | 7,507 | 1,813 |
2000 | 3,235 | 12,977 | 2,303 |
2001* | 2,239 | 9,853 | 3,902 |
* | through August, 2001 |
Data Refreshing:
Migration:
Bill Savage
UMI Dissertations Publishing
bill.savage@il.proquest.com
bsavage@umi.com
1-800-521-0600 ext. 6726
30
[ ECURE Home | Archives | 2001 Presentations ]
© 2001
Bill Savage —
Last Modified
Thursday 28 June 2007
Visits to this page: